Maria Kononova vs Mia Slama Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent second serve performance, Kononova edges out Slama with 39.91% of points won compared to Slama's 37.41%. Does this give Kononova a significant advantage? Quite possibly, as this stat is highly correlated with match success.
• Kononova demonstrates slightly superior return game stats on opponent's second serve, winning 51.04% of points, compared to Slama's 50.67%. However, Slama performs better on first serve returns, securing 39.73% of points versus Kononova’s 36.44%.
• When under pressure, Kononova has a significant advantage, saving 46.24% of breakpoints, whereas Slama can only muster a 30.95% save rate. This might play a key role in turning close games.
• Looking at overall match performance over the last year, Slama has a higher win percentage at 50% compared to Kononova's 42.42%. Who might be seen as more consistent? Possibly Slama.
• Considering their preferred surfaces, Kononova excels on clay with a 49% win rate, while Slama shows better results on indoor hard courts with a 50% win rate.
• Given their tournament levels, Slama has had greater success at the Futures/Satellites level with a 71.43% win rate, compared to Kononova's 43.75% success at the Challengers/ITF level. Does event level impact their competitiveness?
• With opponent quality, Slama has faced higher-ranked competition, with an average rank of 250.5, as opposed to Kononova's average ranking of 364.39 for opponents.
• In deciding sets, Kononova has a better track, winning 63% compared to Slama’s 50%. Could this indicate resilience in tight situations for Kononova?
• Kononova is more adept at converting break points, with a 46.46% success compared to Slama's 29.82%, which could be pivotal when opportunities arise.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

As we compare Kononova and Slama, several important stats stand out. Kononova demonstrates a slight edge in second serve performance and converting breakpoint opportunities, two areas closely linked to match outcomes. Her resilience under pressure, shown by her high breakpoint save rate, suggests she might prevail in critical moments.

While Slama has played more challenging opponents and shows overall consistency in her match wins, her significantly lower breakpoint conversion and save stats hint at vulnerabilities when she's tested.

However, the deciding factor may come down to how these stats play in the context of their preferred playing surfaces and overall match preparation.

A close contest is expected, but Kononova's strengths in crucial performance areas and experience in deciding sets provide her with a narrow edge to secure the win against Slama.